Much has been written lately on the topic of iPads in Primary schools as opposed to the use of own devices. In this post I intend to set out my experiences related to this conversation and the arguements which, from my perspective, inform the debate based on my school's circumstances. In the end however, I am not going to suggest which route is the "best." I'll simply outline what we did and leave your decisions to you.
Earlier this year my class was given
the opportunity to carry out a pilot programme to begin instituting
the use of mobile devices to allow the children to experience the
benefits of a flat classroom. In other words, for them to experience
learning outside the classroom which was not just a euphemism for
doing work "chained" to a desk outside the school (ie
bedroom, library, etc.).
Among the issues we dealt with in our
preparations, was the issue of which devices we should have the
children using. While cost was a factor in deciding which devices to
use, it was not the most significant.
We had several options open to us. The
first was to lease a class set of netbooks, which was quickly discounted
due to our dissatisfaction with our current units. The second was to
use own
devices. The third, was to purchase and lease to parents a class set
of iPad2s.
Our classroom demographics were the
following: Fifteen children aged eleven. A slightly male bias in
gender existed in the class. About 80% were EAL with good or very
good levels of reading, writing and comprehension in English. All
were experienced Constructivist Inquiry learners. The soci-economic
status of the class was Upper Middle Class or greater with the vast
majority of parents being graduates with professional degrees. The
class were relatively versed in incorporating various forms of
technology, from IWBs to various internet tools such as Google Docs
and Dropbox as well as video and audio editing software, to
personalise their learning. All but 2 had some form of mobile devices.
Two had Apple products, the rest had Nokia smartphones, Blackberries and
personal netbooks.
Our decion making revolved around
several issues. So, I'll examine the issues in our
circumstances for each of the two remaining options. We looked at iPad2 as a
serious possibility. First, some children (20%) already owned Apple
products and could help those for whom the operating environment was
unfamiliar. Second, the support was such that if there was a serious
problem we would have confidence the products would be supported.
Third, portability and stress tolerance was important and we felt
that the iPads, based on our research with other schools, could stand
up to drama of a Primary school day. Fourth, screen size was
important. We already had experience of netbooks whose screens were
far too small in an effort to make them portable. Thus, iPads did
provide a larger area to read on. Fifth, the large number of applications was seen as an added feature.
On the other hand, having the children
bring in their own devices, also had its benefits. First, the devices
were already in the children's pockets and school bags, thus the
parental concern of "will it be used outside school?" was
already answered. Second, these were devices the parents and children
had already invested time in to investigate, learn and add apps which
personalised the device. Third, the devices had no learning curve for
basic functionality. Fourth, the concern over small screens was
discussed, but since the children were not spending a significant
number of hours staring at the screens this was less of a concern.
Moreover, most devices had a relatively simple text enlargement
method. The children were asked if they felt the screens were
difficult to look at or navigate and they all said 'no, otherwise we
would not have bought ----." It is important to keep in my we
ran quite a pragmatic and agnostic programme. The children could
bring in any device they felt comfortable using. As a result we saw
some swapping one device for another from home until they had one
they felt satisfied their needs.
In the end we went with own devices.
Surprisingly, we had few connectivity issues after the "get
networked" day, where all the kids brought in their devices, the
IT rep was there and within 30 minutes all the devices were online
except two. Those two shared other devices with students.
The devices proved to be very little
hassle at my end because the owners were quite reliable in terms of
knowing how to use them. Moreover, in all cases, there was another
learner in the class who had the same device and could lend support if
needed. Hence we could get right to the learning
engagement at hand.
The results from the children were that
it was very successful. I had no discipline problems, work got done
(on time!) and the enthusiasm was strong and maintained throughout the month. Overall the project was deemed a success.